Skip to main content

Comprehensive, multi-national approach needed for African maritime security

Comprehensive, multi-national approach needed for African maritime security
Written by Staff Writer, Friday, 01 November 2013
A senior advisor with US Africa Command (Africom) recommends African security sector leaders increase inter-agency, multi-national, and industry co-ordination to improve African responses to maritime security challenges.

Dr Jun Bando, Africom Commander's Action Group director, was addressing a gathering of 60 African military and civilian leaders attending the Next Generation of African Security Sector Leaders programme this week in Alexandria, Virginia.

Bando and Dr Assis Malaquias, African Centre for Strategic Studies (ACSS) Defence Economics Academic chairman, stressed the importance of regional approaches to addressing maritime security challenges and emphasised the connection between the lack of security and development on land and insecurity at sea.

"Comprehensive, inter-agency, and multi-national approaches and collaboration with industry are key for African maritime security," Bando said with support from Malaquias who noted: "Key areas of strategic importance include human trafficking, narcotics smuggling and piracy. Illegal fishing is another growing problem".

"Fish exports are a major source of foreign revenue for many African nations and as stocks become depleted, food prices will increase and undermine the sustainability of African fisheries. Africa loses more than a billion dollars annually in stolen fish," she said.

Bando pointed out that while piracy and armed robbery at sea have been decreasing in the Western Indian Ocean and other regions, incidents are increasing in waters off west and central Africa, particularly in the Gulf of Guinea. Patterns of criminal activity are a key difference between eastern and western African maritime threats she said.

"Piracy and armed robbery at sea in West Africa are not based, typically, on the kidnap-for-ransom model that has been characteristic of the problem in East Africa," Bando said.

Rather, it is often focused on the theft and resale of cargo, including oil bunkering. Much of the piracy occurs in territorial waters, making bilateral and regional agreements essential. Bando told her audience that 23 West African states in the Gulf of Guinea signed a Code of Conduct in June 2013 in response to UN Security Council Resolutions calling for the development of a regional framework to address maritime threats.

While this code is similar to the Djibouti Code of Conduct in East Africa, it is more expansive encompassing illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and various forms of trafficking.

The role of the Africom in African maritime security is to support maritime security forces through capacity-building exercises, combined operations, and tailored maritime security strategies. In 2011 and 2012, for example, the United States conducted combined maritime law enforcement operations with Sierra Leone, Senegal, Gambia, and Cape Verde through the employment of US Coast Guard assets, resulting in the seizure of 75 tons of illegally harvested fish.

Such models of collaboration between US and African maritime forces will go a long way in developing much needed African capacity, she said. The Next Generation of African Security Leaders programme started on October 21 and is scheduled to run through to November 8.

ACSS is the pre -eminent US Department of Defence (DOD) institution for strategic security studies, research and outreach in Africa. The Africa Centre engages African partner states and institutions through rigorous academic and outreach programmes to build strategic capacity and foster long term, collaborative relationships.

Over the past 14 years, more than 6 000 African and international leaders have participated in over 200 ACSS programmes.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute