Skip to main content

Rwanda: Sylvain Sibomana, the FDU-Inkingi’s Interim Secretary General, has been unfairly sentenced to two years in prison


Rwanda: Sylvain Sibomana, the FDU-Inkingi's Interim Secretary General, has been unfairly sentenced to two years in prison.

Kigali, November 22, 2013
On Friday November 22, 2013, the Nyarugunga First Instance Court announced the verdict in the trial against Mr. Sylvain Sibomana, the FDU-Inkingi's Interim Secretary General, and Mr. Dominique Shyirambere, on two accounts:
• Organizing illegal protests while attending the appeal court hearings in the trial against the FDU-Inkingi's Chairperson, Ms. Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, on March 25, 2013, within the Kigali Supreme Court's premises.
• Uttering defamation against Security Services.
This case had been first presented to the Gasabo High Court but owing to some jurisdiction limitations the High Court declared itself incompetent to try it. The Court had therefore decided to send the case back to the Nyarugunga First Instance Court where the same case had already been heard on November 4, 2013.
In its conclusions, the Nyarugunga First Instance Court found Mr. Sylvain Sibomana guilty of the above mentioned two accounts and sentenced him to two years in prison with a fine of one million Rwandan Francs (1,000,000 FRW) in litigation fee. With regard to Mr. Dominique Shyirambere, the Court sentenced him to five months in prison with the same fine of one million Rwandan Francs (1,000,000 FRW) in litigation fee.
The trial was characterized by the Prosecutor's inconsistency with regard to some articles of the Penal Code pertinent to the High Court level. The Prosecutor failed to acknowledge the fact that it was because of such jurisdiction limitations that the case was sent back to the First Instance level specifically in reference to the alleged charges against the accused and related punishments according to the Penal Code.
When the Prosecutor was prompted to provide irrefutable evidence that the alleged crimes might have been committed by the accused, he couldn't say anything better than saying that someone was found carrying in his pocket a badge harboring Ms. Victoire Ingabire's picture. Surprisingly, the Prosecutor swallowed his tongue when the Judge asked him to explain how such a picture could be linked to the alleged charges against Mr. Sylvain Sibomana and Dominique Shyirambere.
In their defense, the accused demonstrated how their citizen's rights have been severely violated, a fact that clearly implies that their arrest amounted to intimidation tactics aimed at specifically preventing the Rwandan people from massively attending the court's hearings of the trial against Ms. Victoire Ingabire even though by attending such court's hearings, the public did not violate any law. Indeed, throughout the Ingabire's trial, the court's hearings have always been held in public. The trial was closely followed by numerous people and various organizations, including the Embassy of the Netherlands in Rwanda.
It is important to remind the public that the case against Mr. Sylvain Sibomana and Dominique Shyirambere had already been tried by the Gasabo High Court on June 10, 2013. At that time, the Judge announced that the verdict would be announced on July 12, 2013 but on that date the Judge postponed the verdict to July 19, 2013 then once again to July 24, 2013. Surprisingly, it is on that date that the same Judge, evoking jurisdiction limitations, declared that the Gasabo High Court was incompetent to try the case. He therefore sent the case back to the Nyarugunga First Instance Court, which is located in Kigali-City.
The political party FDU-Inkingi has always denounced such an inconsistency that is typical of the Rwandan judiciary and is aimed at continuously harassing the Rwandan people by constantly brandishing trumped-up charges in order to muzzle them. We once again call upon the ruling party, the RPF-Inkotonyi, to give a break to the Rwandan people and its political opponents so that we may all live freely.
FDU-Inkingi
Boniface Twagirimana
Interim Vice-President

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute