Skip to main content

Rwanda: Sylvain Sibomana, the FDU-Inkingi’s Interim Secretary General, has been unfairly sentenced to two years in prison


Rwanda: Sylvain Sibomana, the FDU-Inkingi's Interim Secretary General, has been unfairly sentenced to two years in prison.

Kigali, November 22, 2013
On Friday November 22, 2013, the Nyarugunga First Instance Court announced the verdict in the trial against Mr. Sylvain Sibomana, the FDU-Inkingi's Interim Secretary General, and Mr. Dominique Shyirambere, on two accounts:
• Organizing illegal protests while attending the appeal court hearings in the trial against the FDU-Inkingi's Chairperson, Ms. Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, on March 25, 2013, within the Kigali Supreme Court's premises.
• Uttering defamation against Security Services.
This case had been first presented to the Gasabo High Court but owing to some jurisdiction limitations the High Court declared itself incompetent to try it. The Court had therefore decided to send the case back to the Nyarugunga First Instance Court where the same case had already been heard on November 4, 2013.
In its conclusions, the Nyarugunga First Instance Court found Mr. Sylvain Sibomana guilty of the above mentioned two accounts and sentenced him to two years in prison with a fine of one million Rwandan Francs (1,000,000 FRW) in litigation fee. With regard to Mr. Dominique Shyirambere, the Court sentenced him to five months in prison with the same fine of one million Rwandan Francs (1,000,000 FRW) in litigation fee.
The trial was characterized by the Prosecutor's inconsistency with regard to some articles of the Penal Code pertinent to the High Court level. The Prosecutor failed to acknowledge the fact that it was because of such jurisdiction limitations that the case was sent back to the First Instance level specifically in reference to the alleged charges against the accused and related punishments according to the Penal Code.
When the Prosecutor was prompted to provide irrefutable evidence that the alleged crimes might have been committed by the accused, he couldn't say anything better than saying that someone was found carrying in his pocket a badge harboring Ms. Victoire Ingabire's picture. Surprisingly, the Prosecutor swallowed his tongue when the Judge asked him to explain how such a picture could be linked to the alleged charges against Mr. Sylvain Sibomana and Dominique Shyirambere.
In their defense, the accused demonstrated how their citizen's rights have been severely violated, a fact that clearly implies that their arrest amounted to intimidation tactics aimed at specifically preventing the Rwandan people from massively attending the court's hearings of the trial against Ms. Victoire Ingabire even though by attending such court's hearings, the public did not violate any law. Indeed, throughout the Ingabire's trial, the court's hearings have always been held in public. The trial was closely followed by numerous people and various organizations, including the Embassy of the Netherlands in Rwanda.
It is important to remind the public that the case against Mr. Sylvain Sibomana and Dominique Shyirambere had already been tried by the Gasabo High Court on June 10, 2013. At that time, the Judge announced that the verdict would be announced on July 12, 2013 but on that date the Judge postponed the verdict to July 19, 2013 then once again to July 24, 2013. Surprisingly, it is on that date that the same Judge, evoking jurisdiction limitations, declared that the Gasabo High Court was incompetent to try the case. He therefore sent the case back to the Nyarugunga First Instance Court, which is located in Kigali-City.
The political party FDU-Inkingi has always denounced such an inconsistency that is typical of the Rwandan judiciary and is aimed at continuously harassing the Rwandan people by constantly brandishing trumped-up charges in order to muzzle them. We once again call upon the ruling party, the RPF-Inkotonyi, to give a break to the Rwandan people and its political opponents so that we may all live freely.
FDU-Inkingi
Boniface Twagirimana
Interim Vice-President

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute