Skip to main content

Tribert Rujugiro says investing in Rwanda is risky


The Rwandan government last month sealed the fate of one of the country's top private multimillion dollar investments in Kigali, the Union Trade Centre, belonging to Rwandan billionaire Tribert Ayabatwa Rujugiro.
The government sent letters to over 80 tenants at the mall informing them it had seized the investment and that rent should be paid to the state. In South Africa recently, Correspondent Robert Mukomboziasked Rujugiro how he was taking the government's action.
What's your comment about Rwanda's decision to take over UTC?
In an October 1 letter, the Rwandan Commission of Abandoned Properties informed UTC tenants that they must deposit their rent in the commission's bank account, effective immediately. The UTC, which opened in 2006, is home to 81 privately-owned shops, restaurants and other retail establishments.
It is a terrible mistake which will not only harm my interest, but also the interest of more than 80 businesses that operate in UTC, over 400 workers that earn a living there, and Rwanda itself, a poor country that badly needs the taxes we pay.
Worst of all is the message the Rwandan government is sending to other investors, whether foreign or domestic businesspeople. 

What was government's reason for the closure of your business?
They have not presented me with any tangible reasons about how they reached a conclusion to take over my business. In fact, the Rwandan government is now panicking and they have gone through parliament to draft legislation to give them legal cover to take over the mall.
They are including language in the legislation that is specifically targeting property owners who may (1) have died and there is no legal heir; (2) be living in exile due to various reasons; [and] (3) be staying abroad due to various reasons.
The government previously has tried to allege that I abandoned UTC because I reside in South Africa and no longer reside in Rwanda. With no existing law to justify that claim legally, the Rwandan parliament is now rushing to create new laws so as to legitimise some individual's actions and interests.
Categorising UTC under abandoned properties is the most bizarre thing I have seen and heard in a long time. UTC is an excellent corporate citizen of Rwanda operating in line and spirit of the Constitution and company laws of the land. It is dully registered with Rwanda Development Board and large taxpayer to Rwanda Revenue Authority. The fact that I live outside Rwanda is besides the point.
I cannot live in all countries in which I have investments at the same time. There is nothing in Rwanda's company law that says an investor in Rwanda must live in Rwanda. The UTC is one of the country's most successful private businesses. Its businesses support more than 400 employees and contribute thousands of dollars in tax revenue each year. The message here is that the government is not interested in private investment.

What do you plan to do with the rest of your investments in Rwanda?
I will not withdraw my other investment for the sake of the employees, their communities and, indeed my own hard work and sweat that went into creating these assets. 

You had also announced plans to construct a Frw 15 billion (Shs 45bn) stadium in your home town of Nyanza. Should we hope you are going ahead with this project?
We suspended the Nyanza stadium project when the government of Rwanda illegally nullified my Rwandan citizenship, my native country. Where in the world did you ever hear a native losing citizenship of his motherland?

Do you have any plans of extending your business empire into Uganda?
Yes. Pan African Tobacco Group (PATG) is investing heavily in Uganda. In Uganda we recently invested millions of dollars particularly in tobacco processing and production in the north of the country, which will directly create 700 new jobs and support thousands more throughout East Africa. I am impressed by Uganda's investment policies and support.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute