Skip to main content

Fw: [rwanda_revolution] Kagame is a lapdog ally of the US, and gets away with murder.


On Thursday, 7 November 2013, 20:59, Jean Bosco Sibomana <sibomanaxyz999@gmail.com> wrote:
 
Congo-Kinshasa: Fall of DRC Rebels - One Small Step

7 November 2013 , By Tichaona Zindoga, Source: The Herald

THE assassination of Patrice Lumumba, Zaire's first elected leader in
1960, ranks as one of the worst cases of western involvement in
Africa, and in particular this troubled country, now Democratic
Republic of Congo.

It reeks and rankles; and DRC remains to this date a tragic embodiment
of the instability in what is known as the Great Lakes region of
Central Africa.

Lumumba's assassination was connivance among such countries as
Belgium, Britain and notoriously the USA whose then president Dwight D
Eisenhower engineered the plot carried out by the CIA.

Instability in DRC has led to millions of deaths while an equal number
has fled their homes. The fall of rebels in DRC this week may yet call
for a guarded reason to celebrate. It is but a small step in securing
peace, as other fundamentals must change.

The first reason is simply that the spectre of western influence in
DRC and the region has simply not gone away; it has only retreated.
While the DRC government, the Sadc regional force and the UN mission
could pat their backs for having defeated the M23 rebels after a
20-month attrition war, there is one reality that they have to face.

The rains started beating on the rebels when the US and Britain
ordered that Rwanda stop sponsoring rebels. Rwanda, a government led
by minority Tutsi ethnic people, has been backing Tutsi rebels in the
DRC. It is said Tutsis want some Tutsi republic in Central Africa.

Last year, United Nations identified Rwanda Defence Minister, General
James Kabarebe, as the commanding officer of a major rebel movement in
the DRC, indicating that president Paul Kagame and his government are
behind much of the instability in the Sadc member state.

Sadc leaders were unhappy with Rwanda for the same. Uganda was also
fingered in supporting the rebels by supplying M23 with arms.

The order for freezing rebel support which Rwanda and Uganda have
accepted - grudgingly and gracefully, respectively - if the recent
Sadc meeting is anything to go by appears to have been the decisive
factor in the DRC. And the peace depends on the game plan of Rwanda
and its backers.

Some of us are not in the know, at the moment. But there is something
rather worrying in the relationship between the US so entrenched in
its interests in the region, and Kagame who one sees as always keen to
cause havoc in the region, maybe to satiate his power hunger.

One may discount the fact that the United States has said it welcomes
M23's laying down arms, and DRC government's "positive response to the
M23 statement, and its willingness to return to Kampala to sign a
final agreement."

It is understood that Kagame is a favourite of US, and in particular
Susan Rice, Secretary of State.

Jennifer Fierberg, a US social worker and commentator working on peace
and justice issues in Africa with an emphasis on the crisis in Rwanda
and throughout the central region of Africa offers some unsettling
perspectives in US-Rwanda relations. Kagame is a lapdog ally of the
US, and gets away with murder.

She writes, "The assassinations of three Presidents in the Central
African region are linked to President Paul Kagame which includes
President Juvenal Habyarimana of Rwanda, President Cyprien Ntaryamira
of Burundi and President Laurent Desire Kabila of DR Congo.

"How can three sitting presidents be killed in cold blood with no
international outcry, investigation or justice for these murders? For
a person to get away with murder they would have to have friends in
very high political places who are covering up those crimes or are
complicit in them."

She notes that the relationship of President Paul Kagame with his US
and UK supporters goes back to when the RPF was still a rebel group
being formed in Uganda. It stems in part to sympathy of the minority
Tutsis who were massacred. But Fierberg also cites researcher and
Human Rights Watch Researcher Alison Des Forges as having documented
the many crimes of Paul Kagame.

Then comes the special relationship of Susan Rice and Kagame.

Says Fierberg: "Rice has a long history of supporting Paul Kagame in
various ways. From the Clinton administration on the National Security
Council and as Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs during
President Bill Clinton's second term."

Even the New York Times is wary of the Rice-Kagame axis.

Last December, when Rice was still US ambassador to the UN, NYT wrote:
"Support for Mr Kagame and the Rwandan government has been a matter of
American foreign policy since he led the Tutsi-dominated Rwandan
Patriotic Front to victory over the incumbent government in July 1994
. . . But according to rights organisations and diplomats at the
United Nations, Ms Rice has been at the forefront of trying to shield
the Rwandan government, and Mr Kagame in particular, from
international censure, even as several United Nations reports have
laid the blame for the violence in Congo at Mr. Kagame's door."

Rice also worked with Kagame at Intellibridge, a strategic analysis
firm in Washington.

Western interests in Congo, including from the likes of Canada and a
host of big corporate organisations - which all thrive on chaos and
darkness of war - may have first give way for real peace to obtain in
the region.

Regional leaders and genuine DRC peace seekers should actively engage on this.

http://m.allafrica.com/stories/201311070636.html/

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time: 7H30-20H00, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(TU-05:00)***
__._,_.

__,_._,___


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute