DR Congo aborts peace deal with M23 rebels |
Kinshasa refuses deal, and demands revision of agreement's title before it confirms any peace with rebel group.Last updated: 11 Nov 2013 19:56      |
 The Congolese army last month took control of Bunagana, the last redoubt of the M23 rebels [Reuters] |
The Democratic Republic of Congo has refused to sign a peace deal with the defeated M23 rebel group, after Kinshasa demanded the agreement be named a "declaration" and not an "accord". "The DRC delegation has aborted the signing of agreement with M23," said the Ugandan government spokesman, Ofwono Opondo, on Monday. "For some strange reason the delegation of the DRC government did not enter the conference room, where the signing ceremony was expected to be," Opondo said. "They belatedly called for revision of the terms of the agreement and we have adjourned consequently." However, the DR Congo government spokesman Lambert Mende said the problem had come over the title of the deal. "We want to sign a declaration, but the mediator, for a reason we do not understand, wants to impose an accord upon us," Mende said. "If he changed his mind, even tonight, we could sign." Peace talks mediated by Uganda and attended by UN officials were taking place in Entebbe, Uganda. No date has been set for when the talks will resume. The M23 group controlled strings of towns in the mineral-rich Eastern Congo before Congolese troops backed by a 3,000-strong UN force pushed them out of the central African country last month. Government troops wrestled Bunagana, the last town in rebel hands, from the group on October 31. Two days afterwards, and 20-months after they started the rebellion, the rebels sued for a ceasefire. The world's largest UN peacekeeping force is in Congo, helping the government fight M23. Rwanda and Uganda have been accused by Congo's government and the UN of backing the rebel forces, but have repeatedly denied the allegations. |
Source: Al Jazeera and agencies |
Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...
Comments
Post a Comment