Skip to main content

ICTR/UN – RWANDA TRIBUNAL WILL MISS CLOSURE DEADLINE


8.11.13 - ICTR/UN – RWANDA TRIBUNAL WILL MISS CLOSURE DEADLINE

Arusha, November 8, 2013 (FH) – The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) will not be able to meet its December 31, 2014 closure deadline set by the United Nations, Hirondelle learned Friday.

Although the Tribunal has finished its lower courts trials, it is now handling its last appeals. These include the case of former Family Affairs Minister Pauline Nyiramashuko, her son Arsène Shalom Ntahobali and four others. Nyiramasuhuko is the only woman held by the ICTR and the only woman charged with genocide before an international court.

According to a report on the ICTR website, the Appeals Chamber decision in this complicated and important joint case "is expected to be delivered in July 2015".

The report attributes the delay mainly to the need for translations of certain legal documents.

Nyiramasuhuko and her son were sentenced to life imprisonment by the lower court on June 24, 2011. That day, the judge read out only a summary in English of the judgment. The full text, 1,500 pages in English, came out three weeks later. The Chamber was made up of two English-speaking judges and one French-speaking judge.  However, the six convicts do not understand English and needed a French translation to prepare their appeals arguments. They only got this in February this year.

According to the Tribunal Registry, all the appeals have now been filed, but it is possible that one or other of the convicts may file a request for authorization to bring additional evidence for the appeal. The Appeals Chamber has to read all the documents before it sets the date for oral hearings.

At a meeting with the parties last May, Judge Fausto Pocar said he did not expect the appeals hearings to take place before summer 2014.

The ICTR Appeals Chamber is also handling four other cases involving a total of nine individuals, civilians and army officers, who were all convicted by the lower court. It hopes to deliver its judgments in these cases by December 31, 2014.

Civilians in these cases include Matthieu Ngirumpatse and Edouard Karemera, former president and vice-president respectively of the former ruling party MRND of Juvénal Habyarimana, the ex-head of state whose assassination triggered the 1994 genocide.

Military figures include the former heads of the army and gendarmerie, Generals Augustin Bizimungu and Augustin Ndindiliyimana.

 ER/ JC


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute