Skip to main content

UN rejects Rwandan claim that refugee was a terrorist

UN rejects Rwandan claim that refugee was a terrorist


Jerome Starkey Africa Correpsondent
Published at 12:01AM, November 5 2013

A former bodyguard of Paul Kagame who was abducted in Uganda and taken back to Rwanda on suspicion of being a terrorist had been investigated and found to have no criminal past, the UN has said.

Joel Mutabazi served as the Rwandan President's bodyguard, but fled the country in 2011 after enduring 17 months of solitary confinement and torture after he was accused of supporting an exiled general. He was snatched in Kampala on October 25 and illegally transferred to Rwandan custody.

However, Mohammed Adar, the head of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) in Kampala, said Mr Mutabazi had been granted refugee status after a thorough check of his past.

"It's a breach of the Geneva Convention and it's the worst thing that can happen to a refugee," Mr Adar said.

Rwandan police promised that Mr Mutabazi would face "due process of the law". In a message posted on Twitter, they said that he "will face court like any other suspect", but they have refused to say where he is being held. His wife, Gloria, said yesterday that she had been left in the dark.

Speaking from the UN safe house from where her husband vanished, Mrs Muta-bazi said she knew nothing of his where-abouts or health and was terrified for the safety of their two sons and herself. "He went downstairs to get a soda, then five minutes later a policeman came upstairs and asked me where he was," she said. "We have no information since."

Rwandan police said that Mr Mutabazi was wanted in connection with "grenade attacks in Rwanda". In a statement released six days after he was abducted, they said that he was part of a dissident network with links to "genocidal forces" in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

However, Mr Adar said there was no proof of wrongdoing: "We haven't seen anything to support their claims."

Mr Adar was the most senior UN official to speak out about the abduction, the latest in a series of assaults on Rwandan refugees. Two other men, Innocent Kalisa and Pascal Manyirakiza, were abducted from Kampala in August. Mr Kalisa has not been seen since.

"Rwandan refugees are one of the highest risk groups among refugee communities in Africa," Mr Adar said. "Their record speaks for itself."

He called on the Rwandan authorities to ensure Mr Mutabazi was "treated well", and he criticised the Ugandans for failing to protect him.

Mr Mutabazi had been living in a UN safe house after surviving an assassination attempt in Kampala last year.

ENDS

Jerome Starkey
Africa Correspondent
The Times

M: +254 (0) 708 777 615
M: +44 (0) 7747 038 308
Twitter @jeromestarkey

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute