Skip to main content

Paul Kagame’s deep seated hatred for the Hutu as a race is open to the world


Paul Kagame's deep seated hatred for the Hutu as a race is open to the world

By Prof Charles Kambanda

Prof. Charles Kambanda

Prof. Charles Kambanda

It is now Kagame Junta official position: the Hutu (of any age, social or official status) must apologize to the Tutsi for the genocide. This was imposed to the nation from a Cabinet and high government officials' retreat, chaired by Paul Kagame.

Questions:

  • Is the crime of genocide inherent in being a Hutu or like any crime, liability for the crime of genocide is personal?
  • Kagame has been telling the world that there are no Hutu, Tutsi or Twa in Rwanda. He abolished national cards bearing people's ethnic groups. Where did he get this list of the Hutu who must apologize to the Tutsi for the crime of genocide? I hope Paul Kagame's friends, including President Bill Clinton and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair who have been promoting Paul Kagame, now realize how deceitful their buddy is!

Kagame's deep seated hatred for the Hutu as a race is open to the world:

  • Paul Kagame is a "professional" at exterminating the Hutu like flies; he will always create a pretext for his evil intentions.
  • Paul Kagame, under his apartheid-like junta has excluded the Hutu from participating meaningfully in the country social, political and economic life. He has created a second class citizenry of the Hutu; with no rights and freedoms.
  • Kagame has killed the common consciousness of the Hutu; he has convinced the world that the Hutu alone are responsible for the genocide and other crimes of international concern in Rwanda. This is wrong. Some Tutsi, including Paul Kagame himself committed genocide and other crimes of international concern against the Hutu. True some Hutu committed genocide and other crimes of international concern against the Tutsi. As between the Hutu and Tutsi in Rwanda, Paul Kagame is institutionalizing an "evil vs. holy" relationship between the Hutu and Tutsi. On the one hand the Hutu are inherently evil who must apologize to the Tutsi for the genocide and its consequences whether they were born before or after the genocide. On the other hand, you have the "Holy" Tutsi – who are inherently holy, innocent and victims of the Hutu – who will be receiving and accepting apology from the evil Hutu!
  • Kagame is currently subjecting the Hutu, especially in rural areas, to forcible vasectomy.
  • Over 95% of people languishing in prisons are Hutu.
  • A big number of the Hutu in Rwanda is subjected to forced labour under what is officially called (TIG); they provide free labor to "communities" and government for what? To compensate the Tutsi for the genocide and property destroyed during the genocide.
  • The Tutsi survivors and their relations have access to free education and health care.

Their Hutu counterparts who were the victims of the genocide and other crimes committed against some Tutsi are having no such opportunities.When you have a minority armed group subjecting over 84% of the entire population to these evils, you can only expect such a country to burst into horrific violence any time. Paul Kagame's PR agents, including President Bill Clinton, stand warned! Dictatorship of the majority is as evil as minority dictatorship.

Further reading on the background information related to this article:

Jambonews – Rwanda: le génocide Rwandais aété  perpétré au nom des Hutu.
http://www.jambonews.net/actualites/20131113-rwanda-le-genocide-a-ete-perpetre-au-nom-des-hutu/ 

Kigalitoday.com – The source is in Kinyarwanda, but briefly it explains how the Rwandan minister of natural resources Stanislas Kamanzi is publicly asking on behalf of Hutu forgiveness to Tutsi for the genocide committed against Tutsi by some of his people.

http://kigalitoday.com/spip.php?article14024

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute