Skip to main content

Paul Kagame’s deep seated hatred for the Hutu as a race is open to the world


Paul Kagame's deep seated hatred for the Hutu as a race is open to the world

By Prof Charles Kambanda

Prof. Charles Kambanda

Prof. Charles Kambanda

It is now Kagame Junta official position: the Hutu (of any age, social or official status) must apologize to the Tutsi for the genocide. This was imposed to the nation from a Cabinet and high government officials' retreat, chaired by Paul Kagame.

Questions:

  • Is the crime of genocide inherent in being a Hutu or like any crime, liability for the crime of genocide is personal?
  • Kagame has been telling the world that there are no Hutu, Tutsi or Twa in Rwanda. He abolished national cards bearing people's ethnic groups. Where did he get this list of the Hutu who must apologize to the Tutsi for the crime of genocide? I hope Paul Kagame's friends, including President Bill Clinton and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair who have been promoting Paul Kagame, now realize how deceitful their buddy is!

Kagame's deep seated hatred for the Hutu as a race is open to the world:

  • Paul Kagame is a "professional" at exterminating the Hutu like flies; he will always create a pretext for his evil intentions.
  • Paul Kagame, under his apartheid-like junta has excluded the Hutu from participating meaningfully in the country social, political and economic life. He has created a second class citizenry of the Hutu; with no rights and freedoms.
  • Kagame has killed the common consciousness of the Hutu; he has convinced the world that the Hutu alone are responsible for the genocide and other crimes of international concern in Rwanda. This is wrong. Some Tutsi, including Paul Kagame himself committed genocide and other crimes of international concern against the Hutu. True some Hutu committed genocide and other crimes of international concern against the Tutsi. As between the Hutu and Tutsi in Rwanda, Paul Kagame is institutionalizing an "evil vs. holy" relationship between the Hutu and Tutsi. On the one hand the Hutu are inherently evil who must apologize to the Tutsi for the genocide and its consequences whether they were born before or after the genocide. On the other hand, you have the "Holy" Tutsi – who are inherently holy, innocent and victims of the Hutu – who will be receiving and accepting apology from the evil Hutu!
  • Kagame is currently subjecting the Hutu, especially in rural areas, to forcible vasectomy.
  • Over 95% of people languishing in prisons are Hutu.
  • A big number of the Hutu in Rwanda is subjected to forced labour under what is officially called (TIG); they provide free labor to "communities" and government for what? To compensate the Tutsi for the genocide and property destroyed during the genocide.
  • The Tutsi survivors and their relations have access to free education and health care.

Their Hutu counterparts who were the victims of the genocide and other crimes committed against some Tutsi are having no such opportunities.When you have a minority armed group subjecting over 84% of the entire population to these evils, you can only expect such a country to burst into horrific violence any time. Paul Kagame's PR agents, including President Bill Clinton, stand warned! Dictatorship of the majority is as evil as minority dictatorship.

Further reading on the background information related to this article:

Jambonews – Rwanda: le génocide Rwandais aété  perpétré au nom des Hutu.
http://www.jambonews.net/actualites/20131113-rwanda-le-genocide-a-ete-perpetre-au-nom-des-hutu/ 

Kigalitoday.com – The source is in Kinyarwanda, but briefly it explains how the Rwandan minister of natural resources Stanislas Kamanzi is publicly asking on behalf of Hutu forgiveness to Tutsi for the genocide committed against Tutsi by some of his people.

http://kigalitoday.com/spip.php?article14024

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute