Skip to main content

“Ndi Umunyarwanda” or an unnecessary dichotomy in Rwandan politics | Rising Continent


"Ndi Umunyarwanda" or an unnecessary dichotomy in Rwandan politics

Rwandan president Paul Kagame - Time picture

Rwandan president Paul Kagame – Time picture

Dichotomy is defined as a division or contrast between two things that are or are represented as being opposed or entirely different.

"Ndi Umunyarwanda" is a Rwandan sentence meaning "I am Rwandan" but the expression also defines a current government programme.

In today's Rwandan politics, especially after the military defeat of M23 by the FARDC, "Ndi Umunyarwanda" is a national initiative being forcibly implemented across the country at a worrying pace without any prior consultation of the population. Sorry, as if there can be any under a dictatorship.

According to the Rwandan Patriotic Front's authorities, at least as this was last week explained on a national radio by the vice president of the organization, namely Christophe Bazivamo, the programme is a continuation of another one announced by the Rwandan president Paul Kagame on June 30th 2013.

This was during a Youth Connekt conference in Kigali. He requested from all Hutu indistinctly, and especially its youth, to ask for forgiveness for the sins committed by their parents and relatives to their fellow Tutsi, this during the 1994 genocide. Obviously, the same cannot be done for the millions of Hutus fallen in the hands of RPF both in Rwanda and DRC.

Let's pause and reflect a bit here. Could we today imagine for example the present generation of Germans that came after the defeat of Adolf Hitler asking to be individually forgiven by the Jews for the crimes committed by their ancestors and fellow NAZI? Let not forget that NAZI, though in power during their time, were a tiny fraction of the Germans.

Although there are many fundamental differences between the genocides committed in Rwanda and Germany, that mentioned reference is what the Rwandan Patriotic Front of Paul Kagame is busy doing with Hutus since June 2013.

After 19 years of denying the existence of Tutsi and Hutu ethnic groups in Rwanda, it is surprising from Paul Kagame to forcibly dictate to Hutus, even those who were not born in 1994, that they have to publicly ask to their compatriots Tutsis for forgiveness for the sins committed by some of their fellow Hutus back in that national tragedy.

This policy is being rushed from top to bottom of the Rwandan administrative structures after that the Gacaca judiciary system has confined more than 1,500,000 Hutus and their entire families to a second class category of citizens.

That this government campaign moves at a serious pace as reported by the EastAfrican, apparently because many high ranking government Hutu officials lead the apology queue, this only explains that there are Hutu dignitaries who are motivated by greed and ready to preserve their selfish interests without any consideration of their attitude on present and future generations of Rwandans, both Tutsis and Hutus.

It is critical to remember that for the RPF to come to power it played the ethnic card of the Tutsis perpetual victims of the Hutus. It has persistently played it while it systematically oppressed, imprisoned, killed, deprived and discriminated the Hutu during its 19 years of power.

Presently the RPF duplicity has become well documented by everyone even those that have been heavily supporting it. Consequently, in order to remain in power, after the falsely constructive policies of national unity and reconciliation, development, Gacaca, Agaciro, land allocation, healthcare, education for all, and many more, the regime is looking into "Ndi Umunyarwanda" for its final stand for salvation before the abyss it is heading to.

The programme of Hutu apology to Tutsi is again another of the mentioned and not well intentioned policies from Paul Kagame. It is only a divisive tool to promote hatred between the two communities. It is aimed at buying the Rwandan president some time since his political image is nationally and internationally declining dangerously. As he usually says with his trademark, he does not care about the consequences of his new policy on Rwandans, as long as it enables him to achieve his personal ambitions.

Early this year, Gerard Gahima, the former Rwandan general prosecutor and one of the founders of RNC asked during a radio interview if the international community was prepared for the next Rwandan genocide. I would today confirm that the pieces of the puzzle are being brought together methodically by the same RPF structures which prepared the conditions of the 1994 one. No wonder the planners of the latter could not be found by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda since the cover up continues. However, people should not be surprised if their identities will be revealed once the leader of Rwanda and his inner circle will be completely dropped by his current Western sponsors.

That senseless international community of capitalists only motivated by its selfish interests should not anymore pretend that it did not notice the preparatory signs of another human tragedy in Rwanda. For 19 years the build-up has been progressing steadily and even supported by the same capitalists. There will not be any room for apology for failing to intervene. There has been plenty instead.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute